Why all women like black men and why its every racist person's fault.

Its no secret women like men who are perceived as bad boys, risky and dangerous. Let me rephrase that. Its no secret that HOT women love bad boys. And everytime you idiot racist bad mouth blacks, mexicans etc. All you do is run your own women into to the hands of the blacks. Its no secret in that the more racist the country, the more those women, especially white women, desire a black man. No girls are more rapidnously horny for a black man than a Russian woman. Ironically you see Russian men beating up all non whites on the subway.

From Lebanon, to Scandinavia to every other location on planet earth, black guys kill it when it comes to women. Even in places like China and Japan where they worship white skin and white people with blonde hair, they'd all easily kick up for a black dude, with a flew sly words in a black cadillac. I guess I can see where racism comes from, in fact if there were none of it, most likely most women would only date black men.

Sure there are a few non black outliers, like rich guys, charismatic guys, guys with game. But the average non black guy who looks like jerry from seinfeld would simply get no pussy.

Sure some women might even say publicly they don't like black men but thats just reverse psychology to satisfy those non black men who are all insecure about losing their women. The typical reponse is to insult and devalue black man in the presence of the white women or asian women. Not realizing this just makes these women want these men more. In fact I've fucked and smashed up pussy that was supposedly not into black men. Its just a myth. The more a country/town/city isn't suppose to like black men, it means the more there women secretly want to fuck you.

Marko Jaric and Adiranna Lima, O hell no

Jaric is not as good looking or rich. In fact I'd bet Lima is probably richer than him. Jaric is not only a terrible basketball player, but when you put his name in google the first search option that comes up is marko jaric ugly! I can;t figure out why she'd go for that guy, clearly there are NBA players with more $ and bigger ding dongs or more fame
http://www.datingish.com/750046560/love-...ctiveness/


I am by no means alone on this one. the only thing I figure is she has a low self esteem and wanted to make sure she married a guy who'd never cheat on her and would kiss her butt (kinda like mariah carey and mr. nick carey - but even nick is not so ugly). This would be like flava flav marrying Angelina Jolie or Prince marrying that girl from Precious.

This supports my theory of very hot rich females wanting beta men with lots of $$$

In fact Marko Jaric is so ugly the first thing that comes up when you type his name in google is ugly... go on type it in

Black dudes in Japan response

@archie, whats a cholo'd down mean?
@American in europe,
You don't have to speak the same language as a girl to bang her if she is obsessed with you because of how you look. I don't think a 9 or 10 would have to speak a local language to get banged in most countries, she'd just have to do something overtly sexual to seal the deal. My opinion is women are at least equally horny as men are. I don't think it matters if Justin Beiber or Brad Pitt speaks Japanese, they'd still hall pussy there.

And explain to me how someone who speaks no english is going to play me? What are they going to do beat me with a pan in the head when we go to the hotel room?

I understand you had difficulties with Jap girls but I had never had none. The only girl I ever got a message from on OKC was Japanese who just came to toronto and the first Jap girl I ever met we had 2 hour long conversation, she asked for my phone number and I brought her back to my place and fucked her brains out. Maybe you need to improve your game or whatever but don't assume because you had trouble to get one everyone else must have.

Bitch shield is largely subjective, if you speak no Japanese and they speak no english as you claim how would you know your being dissed or given a bitch shield?

Girls have there own mind, if you have good game, you plow through bitch shields and diss a girl back and then she goes from dissing you to wanting to fuck your brains out because you stood up to her, I've encountered this tonns of times with attractive jewish or southern italian girls who come from rich families and often they just have rude personalities but do not mean anything offensive by it. Its a "shit test" to an extent and if your game is not very good then it seems impossible to pass. But I hate to use the term "shit test". Many people are in auto insult any stranger mode with rude comments, but when they get it back they get outta that state quickly.

Anyhow if you had to spend $4000+ a month just to get 8 girls a month, then you'd be better off hiring 15 escorts at 250 an hour and you'd have a different girl for every other night and it be cheaper too and then you'd only waste your money and not your time (your 1 year in Japan)since you got rejected so much.

Yawn, no I just suspect your race trolling as opposed to lack of information so I will no longer respond to those kind of race things in your post. Read Rooshs book bang, go use the online material, improve your game and quit complaining to us about how you can't get any because your game is weak.

A forum user asked:

Would it really kill you to put a bitch in her place so women don't build an ego?

Mak daddy said:

This is where I disagree, so now men not must only fix their problems but we must fix female problems too, I say fuck that, drop that bitch, when she cannot get any dick in her legs then she will be forced to change, that is the best teacher, do what I say or go dry for life.

If a woman hits you

If a bitch punched me in the mouth, I'd turn her around and slap her in the face, I'd only not punch her back because it'd probably kill her

Denmark and arabs 3

I assume the above comment is aimed at me. I was not hyping Scandinavia, I was simply stating an objective fact, Denmark has lots of internationally famous models for such a small country. Make of that what you will, I am not saying all or most Danes are goddesses or nothing like that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Da...ale_models

I was not trying to say anything negative about middle eastern men, actually it was quite the opposite, I pointed out that they were victims of Danish racism that is widespread in the media and is on the level of anti middle eastern/anti muslim propaganda. If you approached 100 Danish girls and ask her if she would date a muslim you'd see how "progressive" Danish liberals really are. In hindsight I could see how the wording could be seen as offensive by saying its a dlv to be a middle eastern male, but when I said it I was thinking of it from how the danish girl would view it provided she was racist, which plenty of them are.

And what agenda could I possibly have against you?

lived in Denmark for a year... I can't say I agree with the main point that danes are unattractive.. Denmark has a lot of internaionally famous models for such a small country... most hot girls can be found if you go to the right place/clubs you'll find hotties... You better be into music that just sounds like loud pounding sounds with overly loud music because those are the only clubs the hot girls go to forget bars...

Being middle eastern male is putting a HUGE DLV on you to a lot of the girls there who have only been presented images of muslim that are really bad and almost appear in the news on a daily basis. I'd even put in the realm of being anti muslim propaganda, the kind of stuff that'd make fox news look fear and balanced... I recall hearing numerous attractive girls making the most offensive and racist comments about muslim men that I won't repeat.

Arabs 2

1. I do not consider Turks white, but I have met many people who insist they are so that is already a cloudy argument.
2. Berbers did invade europe, but did they have a concept of race and racism? Did Berbers say blacks and brown better than whites and did they drill it into the heads of those in italy, spain portugal and south france. I doubt it because racial ideas come as an extension of european nationalism that was developed after europeans invented nation states. Berbers were all about religion if you were white and muslim you were no less than a brown/black muslim. Notice I did not bring up roman conquering of africa, romans idea of racism was the further you were away from rome, the bigger a scum you were. It was not based on skin color.
3. The only Arab anti white racial writing I can think of is a single writer from Iraq who said white slaves were inferior because they were some how less intelligent or something like that. But it is far from a colonial indoctrination. I did never deny Arabs oppressed people, but their oppression was not race specific, they oppressed all non arabs to the point that sudanese are not black they are "arabs" fair skinned syrians are not white they are "arabs" and pakistanis are not indians they are "Arabs".
4. Hannibal had many whites in his army(from modern spain but people who are gaelic), those people in roman times from that part of the world had no concept of race.
5.Persians have told me they are white but a different kind of white = aryan. so it is a mucky debate
6. Ancient Egyptian is a a mix of people, I've never seen of anything from that period to say they oppressed specific races especially when by the time of greek invasion there was white monarchs or puppet pharoahs put in place. Anyhow, North Africa was occupied by Turkey for almost 1000 years and most the people in places like egypt to algeria, especially along the coastal regions have far more turkish ancestry than anything else.
7. I don't see how the Dravidian people could have a caste system when they are all so black unless there was some kind of foreign invader. It has always been my understanding that the caste system was basically introduced by white skinned invaders to cement their social status as superior (which is understandable why a conquering people would do such a thing)

South Africa and zimbabwe

In south Africa majority of the wealth and resources is still controlled by the white people from colonial era hand me downs. naturally this creates resentment among the indigenous groups who owned all the land but to see basically a foreign people who came in using force to get rich off their resources. Heck america still won't let dubai control its ports, so I don't see how Africans are more racist when whites control most of the financial resources in south africa.

zimbabwe is a bit different but it came down to the fact that upon independence the 10,000 whites controlled 80% of all the arable farmland. Meaning the 12 million black people in a largely agricultural society would be doomed to poverty forever without land reforms. While Mugabe is heavily criticisized for his actions with white farmers, my suspicion is you'd have a full blown race war if he did not do what he did and many white people would end up dead. It is a sticky situation because the apartheid zimbabwe government was kicking blacks off their land and giving it away to white people until the mid 70s. Many of those people want their land back and then you get the so called land occupations. It is not really possible for a willing buyer willing seller plan to work because zimbabwe as a country is too poor to buy off these multi million dollar value farms at market value. The other complexity comes from the fact that for whatever reason (probably not wanting to leave their multimillion dollar farms - the average white farmer in zimbabwe owns 10 farms) the whites in zimbabwe did not return to their country of origin. This is unusual in what normally happened when African countries gained independence. Ie. when mozambique became independent almost all the white farmers left.

I do agree with the rest of your post, but it would misguided to ignore the role of the spanish in dominican republic racism or the role of arabs in sudanese racism or role of the europeans in rwanda genocide etc.

Arab men as rapist in scandinavia

I been to Scandinavia, and what I don`t understand is if Arab men are such rapist of Scandinavian women, they are they so willing to go back to their houses and get naked? Thats why I do not take the claims serious but as post-malicious allegations. Any how I already use statistics to explain the idea of sweden in a rape epidemic is misguided.

It must be a cultural misunderstanding between Scandinavian women and arab men. They must agree to go back to their place and the at some point the men either misinterpret or the women lie/change their mind post sex and alleged rape (which given what they are doing to Julian Assange who is white) doesn't seem all that unreasonable.

I can't say I experienced any huge obstacles in either norway or sweden. Both were like a cake walk compared to toronto. In all fairness 90% of my initiations were with girls who already made eye contact but even the cold approaches to a set I did well on. I never had overly sexual norwegians or swedes steal girls from me, in fact they seemed completely oblivious to all the hot girls around them and seemed to not give a flying fuck. And even if Scandinavian men pick up women by the dozen it doesn't bother me, because you can see more hot scandinavian girls anywhere or anyplace than you'll see in 5 years in toronto.

Racist, part 1

1. I do not fully buy the resource only argument. When you look at the writing even up to the 1800s when Lincoln fought as a soldier in the plains indian war, it is clear that it is more than resources. It is not necessary for instance to ban interracial marriage to extract resources or conquer a place. When we invade iraq, we did it for oil. When the brits did it years ago, it was because they were non whites. This is why no one ever bothered to invade east europe and colonize them until what Hitler?
also when the different types of white people invaded each other in the new world, they did not put the kids of french into english schools and tell them french are scum and 3/5 human or put the french on french reserve and ban marriage to french people by english.
2. Those nationalist parties across europe are overtly racist. Those european countries have high cost of living and those women in general are unwilling to have more than 3 kids. I have yet to meet a white women willing to have 6 or 8 kids in my age group outside of america or in europe. Most want no more than 1 and 4 is pushing it. 4 is what is needed to grow the population so europe needs immigrants to pay taxes for the old people social benefits. These nationalist do not oppose white immigration, they just oppose what they deem to be inferior races like browns and muslims and slavic people (because they view them as not real whites)

Comprehensive list of places to get women

Comprehensive list of places to pick up women

I was just over at the yoga forum and got this idea. Since women in bars and clubs put up their b-shield and have their picking just because of numbers. Lets make a comprehensive list of places/classes men are outnumbered by women (attractive women) by no less than 3:1.
I remember when I was in high school, I took a psychology class and there were 5 guys and like 30 girls = easy picking. I did the same in university to meet women taking those courses I knew would be loaded with women but now I'm done. So gentlemen, lets construct our list because we all know how women compete for men when there are multiple women around and one man.
-Yoga Class
-School classes (for those still in school) that involve no math (english, history, french, social sciences in general especially psychology and anthropology - stay away from physics if you want to see a pussy)
-Dance class (I'd imagine, try to go for a one where you can grind on her and where you can check out the class composition before you sign up so that you won't be partnered up with a man because of lack of numbers)
-Photographer of female models - I have no clue how to get into that role, but I'm sure it makes picking up hot women easier.

Norwegian girls

I can't speak of everywhere just the places I been.
The easiest women statistically are Norwegian girls, and I had no problem lizard slaying their. I found swedes more attractive though, and they are a bit more aggressive in flirting than Norwegian girls. Norwegians girls expect you to do the approach more than a french or italian girl who if they are into you will try to start a conversation where a norwegian girl would just stare you down. Ukranian girls are also easy. Been to britain but never tried to pick up girls there because I never saw anything I like but it didn't seem worst than toronto. Some seem a bit rude, but some polish girls were a bit flirty with me. Where else... irish girls seemed to be very friendly, and they are easy to bed. Finnish girls are also easy and mexican girls can't get enough. Philipinos and greeks also easy. Actually come to think of it, after living in Toronto for over 20 years, just about any type of girl seems easy. American girls are more outgoing and not stuck into the toronto clique system.

I must disclose I'm a good looking black guy, as in nice facial features, in fact I get told I look like I belong on a magazine or a tv or something, so my experiences with women may be above average (which is ironic because when it comes to toronto thats not the case, its probably below average outside of school). I have yet to hit up any liz liz from girls outside of school or outside of the country. that is if I did travel outside Canada and if I did not take those psychology courses in university/high school (and minus sex in elementary school) that had like 90% girls, then I'd probably still be a virgin. IE. If I moved here as a 20 y/o I dont think I'd get any girls. when it comes to toronto, it is very hard to be a man, below average women get hot dogs thrown at them all the time because of how few non fat/ugly/frumpy women their are. What is really like a 3-4 probably has a line of men waiting to date her at any given time, and you;d be hard pressed to find anything above a 4.5-5 out of 10 in toronto. Breast implants are rare and those carrie prejean or denise richards or beyonce type girls are basically non-existant in canada as far as I've seen.

I can't say there is a hardest country in europe to pull in, because compared to toronto where you are assumed to be an axe killer/serial rapist(because of historical reasons I document below), where men outnumber women by 15-20%, where women are given free access to clubs just because of how few of them go to clubs compared to men and men are routinely screened out for bs. If I had to pick one, I'd pick britain, just because I never got any physical ve jay jay there.

I'd recommend for any decent looking black guy to go to sweden so he can also experience what it is like to drown in Vj jay, complete hotties drool over black men there it is quite comical, I now know what it is like to be a white man in asia or latin america LOL.

As to why toronto women have such negative opinions of men. It comes down to the fact that toronto people are largely immigrants from ww1 and ww2 and other 20th century wars (Germans, Poles, Italians, Ukranians, Russians, Chinese, Koreans, etc.) Many of the women during this time were raped and even the ones who were not raped have the fear of men raping them engrained into their mind. (think rape of nanjing or how russian army allegedly raped 100,000 women in the day they conquered berlin). Long story short the girls/women of today have parents and grandparents who were most likely raped and therefore are distrustful of men. The best proof of this is the most open sexually women are the irish canadian white women who did not have this experience (ie toronto has been 90% irish 10 years after it was founded or so). some have speculated toronto women are cold because of some puritan roots(english). This is a misnomer, because the Irish according to historians made up 90% of the population by the 1850s (toronto founded in 1830s). further Before toronto even existed as a formal city it was called york at which point american loyalist outnumbered british canadians by 10 to 1 (much like americans in texas when it was in mexico). And it ended in a similar fashion except the british won (see upper canada rebellion) because america did not want a full war at that time.

Also Toronto women are highly feminazi, and have a princess complex. Yes all women have this, and understand american women have this too but it is nothing like the ones from toronto. Not every single toronto women has this, but if she is not, she probably has a dozen male friends all lining up to date her even if she is not attractive at all (I've seen it). to have a gf here it requires a certain level of self degradation and willing to deal with BS that I care not for anymore. The only women worth going for here is one who usually comes to you or will make it very easy for you to pick her up(ie she is obviously checking you out). and in my experience those have generally been east/south european immigrant girls anyways. You don't want to date those british english Canadian girls they will make you do all the work in the relationship even if you are successful.

Anyways, thats my rant.

Middle Eastern Men in Denmark

I lived in Denmark for a year... I can't say I agree with the main point that danes are unattractive.. Denmark has a lot of internaionally famous models for such a small country... most hot girls can be found if you go to the right place/clubs you'll find hotties... You better be into music that just sounds like loud pounding sounds with overly loud music because those are the only clubs the hot girls go to forget bars...

Being middle eastern male is putting a HUGE DLV on you to a lot of the girls there who have only been presented images of muslim that are really bad and almost appear in the news on a daily basis. I'd even put in the realm of being anti muslim propaganda, the kind of stuff that'd make fox news look fear and balanced... I recall hearing numerous attractive girls making the most offensive and racist comments about muslim men that I won't repeat.

I assume the above comment is aimed at me. I was not hyping Scandinavia, I was simply stating an objective fact, Denmark has lots of internationally famous models for such a small country. Make of that what you will, I am not saying all or most Danes are goddesses or nothing like that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Da...ale_models

I was not trying to say anything negative about middle eastern men, actually it was quite the opposite, I pointed out that they were victims of Danish racism that is widespread in the media and is on the level of anti middle eastern/anti muslim propaganda. If you approached 100 Danish girls and ask her if she would date a muslim you'd see how "progressive" Danish liberals really are. In hindsight I could see how the wording could be seen as offensive by saying its a dlv to be a middle eastern male, but when I said it I was thinking of it from how the danish girl would view it provided she was racist, which plenty of them are.

And what agenda could I possibly have against you?

Being good looking

I'm of this opinion. If you're a man and VERY good looking like lets above an 9.0, women will seldom approach you because you're too good looking and they are intimidated. If you are however cute which is like above a 8 women will offer their pussies on a platter for you.

Just like how few guys would approach a set of 3 hot girls

Phil Asheo analyzes the Western Woman

Phil Asheo

12-05-2011, 03:58 PM

All women basically are high priced prostitutes except the sluts.
In Western feminist psychology
slut= women who gives away sex for free
virtuous normal women = women who gives sex only after man has given proper value for it ie. paid for many dinners, bills, dated, etc.
Reality
slut = women who has sex in exchange for resources (typical western women)
normal = women who has sex because sex feels and is good to have.

Why Toronto sucks

If you are thinking of coming to Toronto or Canada here are 10 quick reasons to stay away from toronto

1. Bad Transit.  I been to many European countries and in comparision for our cities size their is no explanation why buses are so slow, routinely come late and if you live more than 10 minutes away from a subway in Toronto traveling sucks because of the high amount of traffic.  This country lets in 250,000 people every year and allows them to all come to Toronto, which doesn't bother me, but what does bother me is how there is no attempt to build more roads to accomodate all the new people

2. Rising housing prices even in slums.  Roach infested houses in the most dangerous areas of the city will cost you 1400 a month.  Average house prices is 433,000 and the price of a 25-40 year old bungalow in the north end will run you 500k for no good reason

3. Bed Bug infestation of many places in toronto also sucks

4. Dating scene is terrible.  Ever heard of Mystery and the Mystery method for picking up women.  Well let me just put it this way, there is a reason why despite the fact that Toronto has 2.5 million people or 5 million if you count the suburban regions which have a slightly different flavour, why picking up girls as a psychology comes from Toronto.  Women in this city are just psychotics, no better way to put it than that.  They assume every man is an axe murderer until you prove otherwise.  They are EXTREMELY stand offish even to guys they like because they get so use to being standoffish to men that it just becomes natural for any girl you approach in this city to be either thinking your a serial killer or rude beyond belief.  If you go to any other major city women are normal, sometimes aggressive sometimes less so. The point is that Toronto is the worst city in North America for dating and has one of the highest rates of unmarried people not because people oppose the idea of marriage, it is because of the girls who all have attitude problems.

5.  Little sister syndrome.  Toronto is always trying to prove what a world class city it is and how it is on par with great cities of the world.  It is true there are a variety of things to do here that you will not find in Omaha, however you will quickly realize anything that seems marginally fun is overpriced to the point most Torontonians never do it.  Further Toronto is the uglier little sister of (fill in major world city, tokyo, nyc, la, chi-town, sydney, london whatever) so they are always trying to measure up and show how they are better than everyone else or find some vague Canadian connection to events that in no way involve Canada.  For example, when Barack Obama was elected as President Toronto news anchors on CTV tried to take credit for his winning even after they ran stories during his election that suggested he lied about NAFTA when he gave a speech.  Then after he is elected they are quick to point out how the governor general who was a black french woman appointed by paul martin (more likely because she was from quebec than because she was black) shows that Canadians are less racist or more progressive than America.  O yes, Canada who has never elected a non white to be the mayor of a major city until 2010 in Calgary (an indian) sure is progressive on race relations.  United States has had a black, native american, whites for president, and just about every race as governors and as mayors of major cities.  Canada has never had a single non white prime minister or a single non white premier of a province or even mayor of a major city who was not ethnic in majority.  The reason Canada had a black governor general is because she was appointed, the reason why there is a black man in the senate is because he was appointed, white people would never vote a black person as a premier or prime minister in Canada and that is just the truth, and hundred + years of history agree with me.

6.  Diversity.  Immigrants cannot get jobs despite the fact that they continue to let them in.  Many immigrants come to Canada and have to have a certain skill set.  Most of whom end up in Toronto.  All to find out that if you were a doctor, doctors from Toronto do not like competition so they ensure they make it impossible for any foreign trained person to be qualified or get a job in Canada.  If you were a doctor, lawyer, dentist, teacher, plumber, carpenter, or mawn lower in your previous country realize no one will hire your or recognize your background in Toronto.  At least in the USA this is not always the case and many immigrants to Canada end up in the USA after 5 years.

7.  Torontonians are NOT polite.  While I have not been to ever part of Canada, I can say in my experience Canadians and especially Torontonians are anything but polite.  Just off the top of my head I was watching a basketball game at the ACC, and the raptors was playing the Celtics and one idiot behind me yelled to one of the boston girls who was suppose t cheer up the crowd or whatever hey b*tch come give me a blow job.  Which made me think, if we were in America, that idiot would probably have watched his mouth, I guess the fact that it is difficult for people to get guns in Toronto is maybe why Torontonians are so rude they feel they can insult anyone and there are no consequences.  Now this is not normal in Toronto, normally people say these things behind your back or out of reach of your ear.  However once you live in Toronto long enough you will realize that Torontonians pretend niceness is simply that.  Sure they say please and thank you but that is just human decency.  Point in case ask a stranger for 25 cents for the bus and see how quick this veil of niceness falls to the floor.  Below this pretend niceness is a veneer of hostility that you will only understand if you come here and then find yourself spending Christmas alone whereas if you went to any other place dozens of people would be inviting you over.  Not that I ever have but I know many people who do.  If your not from Toronto it is difficult to make true friends.  What annoys me is that Torontonians are consistently rude yet they some imagine they are polite.

8.  It is difficult to make friends in Toronto, heck because of people's rudeness and arrogance it can even be difficult to make acquaintances with people.  People from Toronto often routinely see each other, like live besides each other and know absolutely nothing about their neighbours.  As in they would not know their neighbours name if the mail man did not accidentally always deliver the mail in the wrong house.  People like to stick within their social circles and not leave them in Toronto.  If you did not grow up here forget having very good friends.  There are only 2 people who you can make friends with here.   1 are those 5-10% of extroverted people in this city.  2 are immigrants who come from other places and have not adopted the I don't make friends with anyone I did not go to grade school with mentality.  Mind you that 50% of the population is foreign born and do not expect to make any Chinese friends if your not Asian.  Now I will say the extroverts all congregate in the heart of downtown so if you ignore my advice you know where to go, clubs, pubs, strip bars and restuarants is where you can strike up conversations with those friendly few in this weird city

9.  A city with no culture, a country with no culture.  Canada is a country in an identity crisis.  For the large part we have no culture so we made up this idea in the 90s that your culture is the culture of where ever you came from so hopefully you have not been in Canada for too long or else your screwed (anyone of non recent immigrant stock).  Canada was a country formed by a group of American colonialist who were too scared, or basically did not like George Washington, to fight with America so they said lets fight for Britain.  We do not know what American is yet but we just know what we do not want to be... Americans.  Canada has never had a culture you see because those original British colonialist had been living in America for about 100 years and done lost all their British ways and WERE Americans.  Then 1 day they decided they did not want to be what they had always been--- Americans,  The result is Canada has no culture.  There is no such thing as authentic Canadiana.  All our best and brightest end up moving to America.  You may think Vancouver has a green culture, nope sorry they copied san francisco, Alberta whole cowboy culture comes from Black Americans who fled the sun down towns from states with idiots like dick cheney and sarah palin.  Ontario obviously immitates the midwest and the atlantic provinces along with quebec are perhaps the only thing close that come to culture in Canada.

10.  God damned airplanes everywhere.  It is impossible to buy a house or live anywhere in the city that does not have 1 million airplanes flying over it.  there is no zoning, no restricted flight areas, people fly anywhere they want and it is not unusual to not hear something someone says because god damn airplanes always flying by.

Really what cocaine are you doing to make you want to move to Toronto?  If you want to be an actor go to LA, if your gay go to San Fran, if you hate gays go to Alabama, if you like good weather go to florida, if you like cold weather go to chicago or alaska, if you want a big business job go to nyc, you want a good quality of life with decent cost of living go to texas or milwaukee.  There is no reason to come to Toronto except that you could not get a job offer in America

Spartan vs Ninja

Spartan
Close: Short Sword
Mid range: Spear
Far: javelin
Special Weapon: Shield
+armoured from head to toe

Ninja
Close: Ninjato(a long sword used by the ninja)
Mid range: Black Egg (an egg full of glass or pepper that is thrown at the eyes)
Far: Shuriken( a spike star that ninja throw) & Blowgun
Special Weapon: Kusarigama(a wooden stick with metal hook on the end tha look like somethin you would mine with; on the other end is a 14 foot chain and a ball)

From far range the Spartan only has a single javeline which is not all that accurate in one on one combat. The Ninja has the shuriken and the blowgun. This is not really which weapon is better but which weapon sucks less. The shuriken is not lethal but the blow gun is. The javelin is lethal if it strikes but that is unlikely. I guess this ones will go to the Ninja just because a spartan would have no clue how deadly the dart is and might look at how small it is and laugh and think it is not deadly.

From mid range the Spartan has the spear, long deadly every hit and can even kill you just by swinging it sideways without any necessarily stabbing motion. The ninja might not stand infront of the Spartan but he doesn't have to. The spear is long too. The ninja has the black egg, a non deadly egg fully of glass that if it hits the eye will likely blind or blur then Spartans vision. Of course this won't stop the spartan from just stabbing the Ninja after. Its not easy to poke someon in th eye, I have been in plenty of fights, its not easy to throw sand in someones, eye, I have tried it, people are not dumb they turn their heads. You see someone pull back their arm, and you have a 4 foot shield you duck, its that simple, Spartans were master of ducking under the shield and stabbing. If the Ninja wants to hit with the black egg, he must stand still which is certain death,. Hands down Spartan

At close range the ninja has a short sword, the spartan has a huge shield, good armour and a 20 blade inch knife. Know its nice to think the ninja could jump up over the spartans shield and stab him a trillion times. In reality though if the ninja gets close to Spartan he just runs him over with the shield and smashed in his head. The shield of the spartan is the perfect weapon. It kills when it hits, its huge and provides defence. While the Ninja had other weapons like Kusarigama the Spartan will not stand around and watch him swing his ball, he will throw his spear put hid head behind his shield charge the ninja and try to chop him good.

This was a bad matchup in my opnion, there is no situation I could imagine the ninja winning unless the spartan was retarded. I'm not sure if any warrior besides the USA Navy Seal could really beat a spartan. The Sparatan shield cannot be penetrated by metal weapons not counting firearms, the ninjas weapon in the show literally bounced off of the spartan armour. Even if the spartan was sleeping a ninja could not even chop his head off.

The only way to beat a Spartan would be to use some kind of weapon that causes blunt force trauma like the Kanabo. TRy using a kanabo against a Sparata and get a nice spear in the eye. The Sparatans would destroy their enemies, even when Sparta lost wars, they stilled killed more of the enemy then they lost. Ninjas were really Samurais who did not follow the Samurai code, so a Ninja killed people in their sleep, stabbed them in their back, did things stricktly forbidden in Samurai code.

While the show liked to portray the ninja as someone who could fight well, the reality was that Ninjas did not fight, they killed. If you are a Samurai and hate some other guy who you can't beat in a fair fight, you higher a ninja, to throw a black egg in his face or shoot him with a blow dart or throw a couple shurikens at him when he is not wearing armour. A ninja would not fight one on one with a spartan if he could because a ninja did not fight, they stabbed people in their sleep, and threw eggs in people faces, ninjas disable people, they don't win wars.

Viking vs Samurai

What Viking has going for him
Close: Great Axe
Mid range: Long Sword
Far: Spear
Special Weapon: Shield
+chain mail armour

What Samurai has going for him
Close: Katana
Mid range: Naginata (a stick with a sword on the end)
Far: Yumi (long bow)
Special Weapon: Kanabo (a big huge stick that weighs twice as much as a great axe and can smash the end off of a vikings shield)
+iron plate armour

Who wins from long distance. the viking has a spear, and the Samurai has a long bow that as demonstrated on the show is as accurate enough to shoot out an enemies eye. This is a no contest really. The Viking is using a primitive technology, it is effective if it strikes, however a Samurai who was trained as a warrior from day 1 will likely be able to dodge it, even wearing all that armour. Regardless, the Samurai can shoot out a vikings eye, both of them according to the show. additionally the Samurai can shoot the viking much further than a viking can throw a spear. In long range the Samurai wins.

If the Viking manages to get closer, in mid range and the Samurai is silly enough to use the Naginata, then the Viking wins. His sword will make mince meat of the Naginate which is 75% wood. There is not much more too it, the would be one swing and the Samurai would drop that weapon and pull out his kanata.

Close range. At this range, the Samurai would likely use his superior skill to disarm the viking of his sword, even if he did not, he would realize his sword was useless against the Vikings chain mail. Depending upon how smart the Samurai is he will live or die. If the Samurai is dumb then he will just keep trying to hit throw a shield and armour he can't penetrate.

here is where I disagree with the show. I believe in 90% of the cases the Samurai would lose. Even if the Samurai used his skill to disarm the viking of both his sword and his great axe, then the Viking would laugh because the Samurai cannot hurt him with a kanata end of story.

Now the kanabo is a great weapon, based on the show it was right that the Samurai wins. However, less then 5% of Samurais actually carried kanabos. Why? remember the average Samurai was like 5'8 and 150 pounds, does he want to carry around a 40 pound kanabo?

If a Samurai actually carried a kanabo then yes the Samurai would win. If the kanabo doesn't break the viking shield, it breaks the vikings arms just from the share weight. Wherever the kanabo hits it breaks and destroys. If a kanabo hits a great axe, the axe get stuck in the kanabo and the viking is disarmed. If the kanabo hits the long sword, the long sword goes flying. The big down side to the kanabo is that if your fighting a fast enemy (like a ninja or samurai) then the kanbo is not useful because that big swing and miss means that your dead.

Ultimately, I have to give this one to the Samuari. He can kill the Viking no contest from far, and if 1000 vikings fought 1000 samurais, assuming the samuari knew a viking was big and slow then he would bring the kanabo and the viking is done. Without the kanabo then it would be the Viking because the Samurai has no short range weapons otherwise.

Deadliest Warrior, Apache vs Gladiator

What apache has going for him:
Close: Tomahawk
Mid Range: -Knives, knives and more knives up to 20 knives
Far: Bow and arrow
Special Weapon: War Club (a stick with a rock on the end)

What Gladiator has going for him
Close: Scissor & Cestus(glove with spikes)
Mid range: Trident and Net
Far: Sling
Special Weapon: Sica (long bent sword)

I liked this epidsode, it was the first episode. I don't see anything unusualy in this battle. What made it for me really was the knives and the apache's skill with them.

These two would more likely meet up in an arena than in a forest. An Apache would more likely meet a roman soldier if they were actually at war with Rome. But lets go with what we got. If the Sling hits you from long range then it will kill you provided it hits your head. However, it is very inaccurate and if I were a gladitor I don't think I would drop my shield and load up a sling if I saw an Apache with his bow and arrow.

From mid range the gladiator can keep back the apache with the long trident, which is quite deadly and the net. However, this is a real loser for the gladitor. Holding the net and trident means he has no shield to protect him from flying tomahawks and knives which are down right deadly from within 20 feet.

On the surface a gladtior seems like he can put up a fight against an Apache however in deeper analyst, there is no chance for the gladiator. He can't win from far, I'd rather have a bow over a sling anyday and he can't win from close because the apache will hit him with flying weapons. There is nothing that the gladitor can even throw to hurt the apache. It doesn't surprise me hear. Gladitors were not warriors, they were entertainers. Put 2 men condemened for death in a battle to the death using gruesome weapons, well its entertainment not made for effiecient killing.